Opus 5.5 is disturbing

Less Bitter16m 3s
0 comments · 0 votesOpen discussionClose discussion
Sign in to join the discussion

    Video summary

    Mo Bitar compares several responses to the same animated-page briefFront-end code generation uses AI to create or modify the user-interface code of websites and applications from instructions or examples., preferring Opus 5.5's creative results to the Codex variants he shows. The examples include scroll-driven scenes, changing layouts and code-generated videoCode generation uses AI or another automated system to create source code from instructions, examples, schemas, or higher-level specifications.. His assessment concerns these selected outputs and does not establish general superiority or production-code reliability.

    Mo Bitar separates enthusiasm for useful technology from objections to company behavior, pricing and control. He acknowledges that fast implementation can still make long-term code quality harder to assess. Claims about continued scaling and employment are his opinions, not conclusions established by the demonstrations.

    Mo Bitar plays and responds to David Heinemeier Hansson's argument that developers are moving from writing code by hand toward directing software creation. He favors adapting to new capabilities while preserving competition and affordable access, and presents his changing views as an ongoing reassessment rather than a final verdict.

    Original YouTube thumbnailWatch on YouTube

    Share this page

    Mo Bitar in blue and David Heinemeier Hansson in white beside the blue and white headline 'OPUS CHANGED MY MIND' on black. Framed in blue with WWW.ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE.VIDEO, 26 September 2026 and duration 16m 3s.

    Mo Bitar argues that recent AI-generated interface demos challenge his technical skepticism, while leaving his concerns about industry conduct and market concentration intact. The examples illustrate visual capability, not a controlled benchmark.