Opus 5 (Fully Tested): A MID-MODEL for a BIG PRICE that still UNDERPERFORMS K3?!

AICodeKing11m 7s
0 comments · 0 votesOpen discussionClose discussion
Sign in to join the discussion

    Video summary

    AICodeKing runs Opus 5 through an eight-task KingBench suite covering interactive simulations, games, mathematics, SVG graphics, 3D objects and an autonomous local fine-tuning workflow. The test reports strong results on reasoning and multi-step software work but weaker results on visual detail and animation.

    AICodeKing highlights a successful data-generation, fine-tuning and local-interface task alongside a folding-table regression and an incomplete wristwatch. The aggregate score ties Kimi K3 in this particular suite but falls below several comparison models, including the preceding Opus release. These are creator-scored examples, not a universal measure of capability.

    AICodeKing also reports verbose behavior and unnecessary file changes in ordinary use, distinguishing agentic coding strengths from general-assistant preferences. Unconfirmed claims about model fallbacks remain explicitly unconfirmed; the useful takeaway is to test representative tasks and total usage rather than rely on marketing or token price alone.

    Original YouTube thumbnailWatch on YouTube

    Share this page

    Blue “OPUS 5 TESTED” above white “LOGIC VS VISUALS” on a plain black background, with no people. Framed in blue with WWW.ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE.VIDEO, 25 July 2026 and duration 11m 7s.

    AICodeKing's eight-task test finds strong reasoning and autonomous coding but uneven visual results, showing why a release benchmark does not settle every model choice.