Accessible digital systems account for differences in vision, hearing, movement and cognition. Their content and controls need to work through suitable interaction methods, including relevant assistive technologies.
AI-driven adaptation can support some needs but does not automatically make an interface accessible. Changes must remain usable and predictable. Evaluation needs to consider actual tasks and people rather than treating one feature or automated score as complete proof.
ELI5
People can use the same system in different ways. For example, a game menu might let someone move between choices and leave a dialog using only a keyboard.
That option can remove a barrier for someone who cannot use a mouse. Other people may need different changes, so one solution will not cover every need.
Is accessibility the same as automation?
No. A system working for an automated agent does not establish that people with disabilities can use it.
Can automated tests prove accessibility?
No. They check selected properties; human evaluation remains necessary for the broader experience.
