Bijan Bowen Tests Xiaomi Mimo V2.6 Pro and Flash

Bijan Bowen37m 57s
0 comments · 0 votesOpen discussionClose discussion
Sign in to join the discussion

    Video summary

    Bijan Bowen tests Mimo V2.6 Pro and Flash across games, a vehicle showroom and a changing city scene. After tool-call problems across several coding tools, Bijan Bowen switches to the native harness on Windows but still encounters loops. The review presents a mixed collection of experiments, not a controlled benchmark.

    Bijan Bowen finds Flash particularly effective at implementing a detailed racing-game design and building a city that changes across time periods. Flash also improves a guitar-store game and revises a skateboarding prototype, although geometry, controls and moving labels remain imperfect. Pro produces a pleasing role-playing recreation after a follow-up prompt and improves a subway game when given concrete feedback.

    Bijan Bowen explicitly acknowledges accidentally combining prompts, selecting the wrong prompt and removing a file that the agent was trying to read. Those confounds weaken direct model comparisons, while repeated tool loops remain a practical concern. Bijan Bowen prefers Flash in these examples without establishing that Pro is generally inferior.

    Original YouTube thumbnailWatch on YouTube

    Share this page

    Bijan Bowen in a blue top beside the blue and white headline MIMO MODELS PUT TO THE TEST on black. Framed in blue with WWW.ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE.VIDEO, 26 September 2026 and duration 37m 57s.

    Bijan Bowen finds Mimo V2.6 Flash more impressive in his game-building tests, but tool loops, flawed outputs and prompt mistakes limit a clean comparison.