The Transcript Looked Fine. The Call Wasn't. - Debugging Voice Agents, Arize

AI Engineer18m
0 comments · 0 votesOpen discussionClose discussion
Sign in to join the discussion

    Video summary

    Fuad Ali uses an AI-generated refund call to show how an apparently acceptable transcript can conceal dead air, interruption and a wrong order number. Listening to the audio alongside the tool trace reveals both the conversational failure and the incorrect action.

    Fuad Ali describes a session view that links turns, audio events, tool calls and latency measurements. Shared semantic conventions can make provider-specific events easier to query, while audio-aware evaluation should examine tone, interruption, transcription drift and task success rather than treating text as the entire interaction.

    Fuad Ali proposes an observe, evaluate and improve loop for voice agents, including reproducing failed interactions against candidate fixes. His account distinguishes the demonstrated tracing and evaluation workflow from a future vision of agents preparing self-healing changes for human review.

    Original YouTube thumbnailWatch on YouTube

    Share this page

    Fuad Ali against a black background beside the blue-and-white headline “VOICE AGENTS NEED AUDIO”. Framed in blue with WWW.ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE.VIDEO, 5 October 2026 and duration 18m.

    Fuad Ali shows why voice agents need synchronized audio and traces, task-level checks and audio-aware evaluations rather than transcript-only debugging.