Bijan Bowen testsEvaluation measures how well an AI system performs against defined tasks, criteria and failure conditions using repeatable evidence. the dated DeepSeek V4.1 Flash checkpoint on interface generationCode generation uses AI or another automated system to create source code from instructions, examples, schemas, or higher-level specifications. and several 3D tasks. He presents these as hands-on examples rather than a standardized leaderboard comparison. An early request for a model slug instead produces a literal slug model, illustrating that capable tool useAI tool calling lets a model request a structured operation from software instead of only returning natural-language text. can still miss a user's intended meaning.
Bijan Bowen explores a browser-based desktop, a car model and two skateboarding implementations. He finds appealing interface details and some improved geometry, but also inverted controls, inconsistent shapes, collision problems and disappointing gameplay. A robot-arm task fails. The demonstrations do not support the title's implication that the model is best at every task.
Bijan Bowen reports stronger results in a subway game, a pool-party scene and a dependency-light basketball game, while noting UI legibility and physics defects. He compares a subway result with an older run but acknowledges that the prompt changed and that a familiar test may not demonstrate performance on unseen tasks. Timing and cost figures are his observations for particular runs, not reproducible universal estimates.
Bijan Bowen concludes that the model appears more capable at his 3D tasks, including some less familiar prompts, without establishing broad superiority or reliable production readiness. Specific API prices, hardware purchasing suggestions, personal health comments and unrelated personal anecdotes are omitted.
Watch on YouTube
