Artificial intelligence alignment studies how to make model behavior match intended goals, values, and safety boundaries. It includes training methods, evaluations, oversight, interpretability, access controls, and governance. The challenge is not only stating a goal but ensuring the system generalizes it rather than exploiting an imperfect proxy.
Agentic and multi-agent systems add persistence, tool use, communication, and strategic adaptation. Alignment work must therefore evaluate behavior over long tasks and interactions, including reward hacking, hidden coordination, attempts to alter oversight, and situations where immediate incentives conflict with broader intent.
Acronyms and aliases
AI alignment variantartificial intelligence alignment variantmodel alignment variant
General terms
Specialised terms
Related terms
Frequently asked questions
Why is artificial intelligence alignment difficult?
Human goals are complex, training signals are incomplete, and capable systems may find unintended ways to satisfy a measured objective without meeting its purpose.
Is artificial intelligence alignment only a training problem?
No. Training matters, but evaluation, monitoring, permissions, infrastructure controls, incident response, and governance also shape whether systems remain aligned in use.
